
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
What's better than the World Cup? the World Cup in Lego!!!

Sunday, 13 June 2010
Day 3 and what's worse, those horns or the ball?

On the other hand, the match ball. The Adidas Jublani ball that's been manufactured specially for this tournament. Multiple goalkeepers have complained about the odd flight of the ball and we've already seen more than one goalkeeping disaster which may or may not of been the Jublani's fault.....but FIFA has contractual obligations with Adidas so as money is involved, we won't see a change of the ball, let's hope the tournament isn't remembered for the ball and plastic horns.
Today's first game saw England's fellow group members Algeria face Slovenia in a match Slovenia impressed in getting a 1-0 from captain and former West Brom player Robert Koren (the goal was another long range effort where the ball bounced just before the 'keeper and they seemed to miss it entirely, while this may make England's Robert Green feel better, you have to seriously wonder about this ball, if i was to mean a team lost the final, is that fair/), it's no coincidence that after Algerian Abdelkader Chezzal was sent off, Slovenia scored, the favourites Algeria just never seemed interesting whereas the Slovenians played with all the passion expected at the World Cup, expect them to cause a few problems against the England midfield.

Saturday, 12 June 2010
England fail to get the Rob of the Green
Police have announced that reports of a large popping sound over the whole of England is nothing to be concerned about - it's just the sound of millions of England fan's bubbles bursting.....The most anticipated game for England in four long, LONG years, one marked by optimism and hope and all those other nasty words that lead down the inevitable road to tears.
So it began, Steven Gerrard meeting expectations before Robert Green made a calamitous mistake (unless your American obviously), this is one spill they won't mind coming from us. The Robert Green jokes will fly around text messages for the next few days so no real reason to add to that (okay, just one, Steven Gerrard says the whole team are behind Rob Green, in retrospect, that's a good place to stand)
Let's look at the positives.....the referee had a good game. Though seriously, it wasn't that bad of a performance and England should of won, though they created a couple of chances, England were a far superior side for skill and possession, patient build up play that didn't work this time as the Americans did their homework and pushed Rooney wide, leaving Heskey in the centre, Lampard should of been in that space....but where was he? don't blame Green, if blame is to be pointed it's at the player that once again in the big games for England, dissappeared! It's hard to fault the other players, Heskey worked tirelessly and if he had his shooting boots (last seen in Leicester in 2000) it would of been so different.
Gerrard led by example, winning the ball, playing the ball and making space, it's his hard work that led to the goal. On the wing Lennon was overawed by the occasion and the fullbacks stopped his runs, he had his moments though Milner was shameful tonight, he'll be lucky to play again in this tournament and he knows it, Wright-Phillips was pretty much the same as Lennon, tried but was closed down. In defence, Ashley Cole and Glen Johnson were restricted in getting forward, it's no coincidence that when USA broke Glen Johnson was out of position, decent games by John Terry and Ledley King were needed, there was no panic in the England penalty box.
The point is this, bar Green's mistake, he only had one real save to make and he did it well. USA worked hard in this game, personally i felt the pace of Jermain Defoe would of been more effective in the final 20 minutes than whatever Peter Crouch was meant to offer, the USA back line was pushing further forward (allowing Heskey to go for the world record in offsides, currently held by Italy's Fillipo Inzaghi in any international game he played), Defoe would of frigh
tened them, Crouch only humoured them (this country has professional wrestling, Peter Crouch is just an anorexic wrestler to them). The Americans forced Rooney wide and didn't allow him time or space to play and they simply didn't allow England to control the flanks, yet England still should of won and that's a good sign. The USA played the game of their lives, they worked so hard for this point and England HAVE to take confidence from that, a win would of been good, a defeat unforgivable but a draw brings us back down to earth, if England are to win, it won't be at a stroll, if lessons are learnt now, it's better than in the knockout stages. In Fabio we must trust.
and at least Al Qaeda didn't make an appearance
After Heinze's goal, Nigeria were always playing ketchup.....

Friday, 11 June 2010
Day 1 - Great goal, first sending off and France underperforming


Wednesday, 9 June 2010
A beginners guide to the World Cuo





Tuesday, 8 June 2010
Why don't Americans like 'soccer'?

I'm not convinced, marketplaces are inherently dynamic, if 'soccer' were a worth
y object of American sports fans interests, it would enjoy greater popularity.....but it doesn't. Which brings me to the second common explanation for it's lack of popularity and the answer i get when asking most Americans why they aren't excited about the World Cup, " 'soccer' is boring". They like high scoring games (basketball scores are rarely under 100, American football has high scores) but in my opinion, a goal scored in football is rarer than a 'touchdown' and even rarer compared to a 'slam dunk', so what that elusive goal is scored, ear shattering howls of euphoria erupt from players, announcers and fans alike, as if their very souls were being released from the depths of hell, compared to a '2 pointer' in basketball which gets another round of applause.Goals are indeed a rare commodity in 'soccer', so much so that 'soccer' is essentially, a zero sum game. The number of goals is meager, it never grows (a 4-0 thrashing isn't all that common), so games are fought over an intensity that is almost never found in American sports, this isn't boring, it's just deeply unsatisfying to Americans brought up on deskilled levels of competitive games where the final result isn't applauded as much as in 'soccer'.
The fact of the matter is, Americans don't subscribe to the 'zero sum' mentality, nor have the belief system nor the temperament for such an endless sport as 'soccer', they like their sports teams to score and to score plenty, they believe this gives value to their 'buck', why labour for the sake of labouring, it's perhaps a lack of sophistication or maybe a large enjoyment of exceptionalism, needing goals galore to gain any enjoyment, whatever it is, i feel it's a shame that such a patriotic nation won't be fully behind a team and able to take joy at competing with the world's best, their interior sports (baseball has the World Series, well......American teams take part as only really America plays baseball, same with American football, a few small pockets of people may play the sport but most nations would play rugby instead) meaning they only compete against themselves. Maybe this tournament will catch the public eye, it can only be for the benefit of the sport if it does.
